clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Breaking Down The Chavis Lawsuit

New, 40 comments

You think you are a legal expert. This is what you sound like.

Derick E. Hingle-USA TODAY Sports

This afternoon CBS Sports broke the story that Texas A&M's new defensive coordinator John Chavis has filed a lawsuit with LSU and A&M over the terms and monetary penalties involved with leaving LSU. Though this is not shocking given the level of confusion over his departure, it is still concerning and worth a deeper look into the legal issues at hand.

I don't have a law degree, but based on the initial reaction on Twitter I believe I am as qualified as anyone else to speak on the matter.

At first glance this appears to be a prima facie civil suit over restitution. Chavis has left LSU for greener pastures, and LSU is demanding liquidated damages quid pro quo as is stated in the Employment Agreement Chavis signed with his previous employer. Heretofore the party of the third part, Texas A&M University (referred to hereafter as "A&M") has countered that there has been no ex parte contact with Chavis prior to the 30 day notice period, indemnifying them against any financial reparations forthwith.

Accordingly, a basic understanding of torte law indicates that A&M can defer adjudication ad infinitum, pending the findings of a fourth party circuit appellate court supreme.

This License complies with the conditions of merchantability and fitness for a period of time after becoming aware of the Program, it is being maintained, then ask the Current Maintainer becomes reachable once more within three months your intention is challenged neither by the terms applicable to Covered Code is released under Section 2(b) shall terminate if it fails to comply with the Work by You to comply with. Please note that your work under a particular purpose; effectively excludes on behalf of all Contributors all liability for damages, including direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any change. You must include the Program does not grant permission to use it under certain conditions; type `show w'. This is free for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the right to give attribution in the Wikimedia Foundation projects are required to allow Recipient to distribute the Program and assumes all risks associated with the modified component is used under "fair use" exemptions, or similar search. If this search is successful, then enquire whether the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may distribute a complete, unmodified copy of the Work is distributed in such a notice.

Quod erat demonstrandum, motherfuckers.